Category Archives: Blog

Canada Strong Fund: An Introduction

The Canada Strong Fund is Canada’s first sovereign wealth fund — and it just launched. What It Is, What Gets Built, and How You Invest

Carney made the Canada Strong Fund announcement on April 27, 2026, the day before his government’s Spring Economic Update. The fund is designed to give all Canadians a direct stake in the Build Canada agenda, with a mandate to achieve commercial returns and build the wealth of Canada.

Big words. Let’s cut through them.


What the Canada Strong Fund Actually Is

The government seeds the fund with $25 billion over 3 years on a cash basis. That’s the starting capital. The fund grows through investment returns and asset recycling — gains get reinvested rather than spent, and additional government assets can flow in over time. Canada Strong Fund — Official Government Backgrounder

It operates at arm’s length as a new Crown corporation, guided by a CEO and a qualified independent board of directors. Think CPPIB, not a ministerial slush fund. That’s the stated model. Whether it holds to that standard is what you watch for.

The mandate is straightforward: invest in strategic Canadian projects and companies alongside private investors, focused primarily on equity, with a goal of delivering market-rate returns.


What Gets Built: The Canada Strong Fund Project Pipeline

This is where it gets interesting for anyone who actually cares about Canada’s economic backbone.

Since September 2025, 15 projects have been referred and six transformative strategies are in development by the Major Projects Office. The sectors: nuclear, LNG, critical minerals — nickel, graphite, and tungsten — and transportation infrastructure.

The Canada Strong Fund targets major Canadian industrial projects across energy, infrastructure, mining, agriculture, and technology.

Read that list again. Nuclear. LNG. Critical minerals. Transportation. These are the hard assets that create durable national wealth. Not apps. Not subsidies. Real stuff in the ground and in the grid.

Carney’s framing is historically accurate — transformative projects like the CPR, the oil sands, and the Trans-Canada built generational wealth. The question is whether this fund replicates that discipline or becomes a vehicle for politically convenient pet projects.

The Major Projects Office is the gatekeeper. They’re processing the pipeline of candidates, and the government is assessing projects for potential designation under the Building Canada Act, which fast-tracks regulatory approvals. That matters — regulatory gridlock has killed more Canadian resource projects than any shortage of capital ever has.


The Canada Dividend: The Part Nobody’s Talking About Enough

Here’s where it gets philosophically interesting.

Norway’s Government Pension Fund — the gold standard globally — distributes wealth back to citizens over time. Alaska does it annually through the Permanent Fund Dividend. Every Alaskan gets a cheque from oil revenues. Every year. Full stop.

Canada is gesturing in that direction. The government will launch a retail investment product, giving Canadians a direct stake in the nation’s long-term prosperity and a share in the returns.

The key phrase: share in the returns. That’s the Canada Dividend concept, even if they’re not calling it that yet.

The details are still being designed through consultation over the coming months, with additional specifics expected in the Spring Economic Update 2026. What we know conceptually is promising: as the Canada Strong Fund succeeds, investors share in the upside while their initial invested capital is protected.

Principal protection plus upside participation. If that holds, it’s a genuinely interesting instrument.


How Individual Canadians Can Invest in the Canada Strong Fund

This is the part that should matter most to readers of this site. And I’m watching this closely to see if it is a good addition to my RRSP and other investing.

The government will offer Canadians the opportunity to participate directly through a new retail investment product — broadly accessible coast to coast, easy and simple to purchase, hold, and transact.

Carney compared it to a government bond where the initial investment is protected. Think: government-backed capital protection plus direct exposure to the upside of major Canadian industrial projects.

Here’s how to think about it as a sovereign-minded individual investor:

What’s potentially good: Direct exposure to the asset class that has historically built real wealth in this country — energy, infrastructure, critical minerals. Not through some mutual fund with a 2.5% MER skimming your returns. Direct participation. And if principal protection is real, your downside is bounded.

What you need to watch: Design details haven’t been released. “Principal protected” can mean a lot of things. Is it inflation-adjusted? What’s the lock-up period? What fees are buried in the structure? How do you exit? A bond-like structure that protects nominal dollars but erodes purchasing power in a 3% inflation environment isn’t actually protecting you.

The deeper question: Is this RRSP/TFSA eligible? If yes, this becomes a genuinely interesting domestic asset class for investors who want to stop exporting capital to US equities. If no, the tax drag changes the calculus considerably.

None of that is answered yet. The Transition Office will consult on these specifics over the coming months.


The Honest Skepticism

Poilievre’s critique isn’t wrong on its face. Canada is running a projected $78-billion deficit — countries need wealth to have a wealth fund, and this is effectively sovereign debt being recycled into equity investments.

That’s a real tension. Norway built its fund from oil surplus revenues. Canada is building this from borrowed money. The math only works if investments generate returns above the cost of that debt. The C.D. Howe Institute made exactly that point — the fund needs to outperform its financing costs just to break even.

That’s not impossible. But it’s a tighter rope than the announcement language suggests. You need the fund generating 7–9% real returns while financing debt at 4–5% and clearing fees and operational overhead. That requires a genuinely skilled investment team executing equity deals in complex infrastructure. The CPPIB does it. Not every Crown corporation does.


What This Means for the Sovereign-Minded Canadian

The Canada Strong Fund is the most interesting structural development in Canadian finance in a generation. The concept is right — pool national capital, deploy it into hard assets, and create a mechanism for ordinary Canadians to participate in their country’s resource and infrastructure wealth.

The execution will determine everything.

Watch the Spring Economic Update for structural detail. Watch the Transition Office consultation — that’s where the retail product gets designed. And watch which specific projects get funded in the first wave. That tells you whether this is a genuine commercial vehicle or a political instrument wearing a financial suit.

Canada has been exporting its resource wealth for a century. The question was always whether we’d build institutions to capture a bigger share of that value domestically. This is an attempt to answer that question.

Whether it succeeds depends on whether the arm’s-length structure holds under political pressure, whether the investment team is genuinely world-class, and whether the retail product is designed for Canadian savers — not Canadian optics.

Stay tuned. More detail will follow.

Are you considering putting money into the Canada Strong Fund when the retail product launches? Drop it in the comments.

Sources & Further Reading

  1. Canada Strong Fund — Official Government Backgrounder
  2. PM Carney’s Announcement — Prime Minister of Canada
  3. CBC News — Carney announces Canada’s first sovereign wealth fund
  4. BNN Bloomberg — Canada Strong Fund analysis

RRSP Withdrawal Tax Canada: The Golden Handcuffs of Retirement

The Retirement Trap Nobody Warns You About

You were smart. You maxed your RRSP and kept your taxes down. But RRSP withdrawal tax in Canada doesn’t care how disciplined you were on the way in. Now you’re staring down retirement with a six or seven-figure balance — and a tax bill that might be worse than when you were working.

This is the trap a lot of upper-middle-class Canadians walked into. They optimized for the front end — the deduction — and never ran the numbers on the back end. RRSPs work fine for the average earner. For someone who actually built wealth? They’re a ticking tax clock.

I’m in this boat right now. Here’s what I’m seeing.


The Setup: Why RRSPs Seem So Smart

  • You contribute pre-tax, lowering your income today
  • Investments grow tax-deferred
  • Many employers match contributions — free money
  • You pay tax on withdrawal “in retirement,” when your income should be lower

That logic holds — if your retirement income drops off a cliff. But what if it doesn’t? What if your lifestyle stays high, CPP and OAS add to your income, and your withdrawals push you right back into a top bracket?

What if you end up paying more tax in retirement than you ever saved while working?


The RRSP Withdrawal Tax Canada Doesn’t Advertise: Paying 48% on Money You Saved at 30%

Here’s the gut punch. Say you contributed $20,000 a year during your prime earning years and saved 30% in tax. That’s a $6,000 refund every year — felt good at the time.

Fast forward 25 years. Your RRSP has ballooned to $800,000 or more.

At 71, you’re forced to convert it to a RRIF and start pulling money whether you need it or not. The minimum withdrawal starts at 5.28% at age 71 and climbs every year after that. Those forced withdrawals can push you into the 43%–48% marginal bracket — especially if your spouse has passed and income splitting is off the table.

Then there’s the OAS clawback. In 2025, it kicks in at $90,997 of individual net income. Every dollar above that claws back 15 cents of your Old Age Security. At $148,065, it’s gone entirely. For most high earners, OAS is either gutted or irrelevant.

So you saved $6,000 a year for two decades — and now you’re handing back more than half of every dollar you pull out.

You didn’t beat the system. You deferred the damage.


What’s the Alternative?

If you’re paying attention — and not just nodding along to whoever sits across from you at the bank — you have options. None of these are one-size-fits-all, but all of them put you back in control.

Here’s what I’m running through right now:

TFSA Same market growth. Zero tax on withdrawals. No mandatory minimums. Ideal for dividend income, U.S. growth stocks, or bitcoin ETFs. Completely invisible to OAS and GIS clawback calculations.

Cash Investment Accounts You pay tax on capital gains and dividends — but you control when. Capital gains are taxed at 50% of your marginal rate, and you choose when to trigger them. Canadian dividend income comes with a tax credit that makes it highly efficient in lower brackets. You can also tax-loss harvest when the market hands you an opportunity.

Holding Companies and CCPC Structures If you own a business — even part-time — you can retain earnings inside a Canadian-controlled private corporation. Most provinces tax the first $500,000 of active business income at 11%–12.5%, well below personal rates. Those retained earnings can be deployed into passive income-producing assets. Pay yourself dividends in low-income years and keep your personal tax bill tight.

Smith Maneuver Convert your non-deductible mortgage interest into deductible investment debt while building a personal portfolio. Your home becomes a productive asset — without selling or moving.

RRSP Meltdown Strategy Don’t wait until 71. Intentionally pull RRSP funds in your 50s or early 60s while your income is lower. Pair withdrawals with TFSA top-ups, part-time income years, or periods with heavy deductions. The goal: drain the account gradually at low rates before mandatory RRIF withdrawals force your hand.

Spousal RRSPs When one spouse earns significantly more, the higher earner contributes — but the lower-income spouse withdraws in retirement. Spreads income across two people. Reduces total household tax.

Attribution rule to know: If the lower-income spouse withdraws within three calendar years of a contribution, the income is attributed back to the contributor. Plan contributions at least three years ahead of expected withdrawals.

Hard Assets and Strategic Leverage Own real estate. Hold bitcoin. Build a cash stock portfolio. Then — instead of selling and triggering tax — borrow against those assets.

Borrowed money isn’t taxable income. You keep the upside, maintain your portfolio, and access liquidity when you need it. Real estate and blue-chip equities can be collateralized through margin loans or secured lines of credit. Even bitcoin — though volatility means sizing matters.

This is how serious wealth stays intact: own appreciating assets, use leverage to spend without selling.

You can’t do any of that with an RRSP.


What Happens When You Die?

If you die with a large RRSP and no surviving spouse, the entire balance is treated as income in your final tax year. That can mean 48%+ goes straight to the CRA.

A spouse designated as beneficiary can receive the account tax-free — but when the second spouse passes, the same rule applies. Full income inclusion. Large tax bill for the estate.

Spousal RRSPs don’t solve this — they only delay it. The answer is keeping RRSP balances modest and planning your drawdown well before the government forces it.


Living Abroad with a RRIF

Moving abroad doesn’t make your RRIF disappear — it just creates new complexity.

Canada applies a 25% withholding tax on RRIF withdrawals for non-residents. Tax treaties can reduce that, often to 15%.

Favorable jurisdictions:

  • Portugal – Often no local tax; 15% Canadian withholding under treaty
  • Mexico – 15% withholding; moderate local inclusion rules
  • Thailand – Often no local tax if offshore income is delayed 1+ year
  • Panama – No local tax on foreign-source income

Less favorable:

  • France – High double taxation risk; no special treaty provisions
  • Germany – May require full income inclusion and reporting
  • Japan – Strict global income rules

Before you relocate, get a cross-border tax advisor to map exactly how your RRIF will be treated.


Don’t Just Contribute — Calculate

Employer match your RRSP? Take the free money. Full stop. Beyond that, start modeling.

  • What bracket will you be in when you withdraw?
  • What happens if you retire early — or move abroad?
  • What does the tax bill look like if you die with a large balance?

Want to run the numbers? Start here: 🔗 Wealthsimple RRSP vs. TFSA Calculator

The sovereign move isn’t to panic. It’s to plan. Run the numbers. Own the outcome.

See more Advanced RRSP Strategy in Canada.


Are you optimizing your future — or just delaying the damage? Drop your scenario in the comments. I’ll share my own modeling in a follow-up post.


I bought an AR-15

Over the years of being a firearms enthusiast and activist, I’ve never actually purchased an AR platform rifle. That changed yesterday…

I think the main reason why I hadn’t was due to the obvious impracticality of owning an AR (and really any restricted firearm in Canada). You can’t take it anywhere except to your range, a gun smith, etc. Between moving multiple times, living in apartments, and being too busy with work to spend time at a range, I figured non-restricted firearms are the best use of my money. And I still do.
But really, with all the negative propaganda from the Libtards, now is the time to put my money where my mouth is.
The only cure for firearms ignorance is an increase in the number of law-abiding gun owners, and an increase in the number of theses ‘scary black rifles’ nationwide.

It seems that every time Turdeau, Tory-Dory, or another of the media-seeking attention-whores opens their mouth on gun bans, well the AR-15 supplies nation wide seem to dry up. It sure is sweet, sweet irony that Fidel Jr. has ended up being Canada’s best gun salesman ever. Now with the Covid-19 Corona Virus issue, and the again increased interest in firearms nationwide, I was very pleasantly surprised to see Bullseye had (when I looked) 20 of the Smith & Wesson M&P15 Sport II units in stock:

Bullseye London Link S&W M&P15 Sport II Semi Auto Rifle

Yes there is a very legitimate future risk of bans. Whether that means confiscation, buybacks, grandfathering, or prohibition from using at all remains to be seen. But as an advocate I need to be a participant in the middle of this process.

I will write more on why I chose this as my entry level AR, my initial thoughts, and a review later. But perhaps my new purchase will help to convince me to get out the range more!

No Gun Ban Canada

The propaganda, leftist populism, and ignorant outrage surrounding the discussion on banning handguns in Canada is disappointing – at best.

In looking at my fantastic local gun store: Bulls Eye London (https://www.bullseyelondon.com), I came across the link to a website providing information on how to petition this move and how to make your voice heard.

Please visit: http://www.nogunbancanada.ca

This latest discussion is exactly the slight-of-hand stuff that the Liberals love.  Costs us a lot of money, makes it look like they are solving a problem that was never there, ends up solving nothing, and it only harms us law-abiding Canadians.  And then it costs us more money than they initial led us to believe.

Just say no to a Handgun Ban in Canada.

First Time fishing in Ontario

Tomorrow I am heading up to Lake Simcoe with a couple of buddies to go fishing.
Other than my high-school, backwoods, carp fishing, catch nothing but a buzz days, this is my first time fishing in Ontario.

The plan is to rent a boat and go fishing for bass and pike out on Cook’s Bay.  Not a bad way to spend a day eh.

So I thought I would do myself a favour and look up the regulations, etc.

Here are the good resources I found:

Fishing Limits

Fish ONline – Reference for fish and limits

Ontario Fishing Licence

Hunting and Fishing Licence Issuers

 

Bill C-42, the Common Sense Firearms Licensing Act

Now that I am finally in the market for a restricted firearm, I had to educate myself on the changes that have recently been introduced regarding the ownership and transportation of them.

There are other aspects of the Act, but of most interest to me is the change to the ATT Authorization To Transport restricted firearms (i.e. handguns, AR-15s, and other guns that are scary mostly cause they are painted black).

Here is the official news:

Effective immediately, these changes to the Firearms Act and the Criminal Code do the following:

  • Make classroom participation in firearms safety courses mandatory for first-time licence applicants;
  • Provide for the discretionary authority of Chief Firearms Officers (CFOs) to be subject to the regulations;
  • Strengthen the Criminal Code provisions relating to orders prohibiting the possession of firearms where a person is convicted of an offence involving domestic violence; and
  • Provide the Governor in Council with the authority to prescribe firearms to be non-restricted or restricted (such prescribing would be informed by independent expert advice).

Within the next several months, upon a date fixed by an order in council, the following changes will come into effect:

  • Creation of a six-month grace period at the end of the five-year licence period to stop people from immediately becoming criminalized for paperwork delays around license renewals;
  • Elimination of the Possession Only Licence (POL) and conversion of all existing POLs to Possession and Acquisition Licences (PALs);
  • Authorizations to Transport become a condition of a licence for certain routine and lawful activities such as target shooting; taking a firearm home after a transfer; going to a gunsmith, gun show, a Canadian port of exit; or a peace officer or a Chief Firearms Officer (CFO) for verification, registration or disposal; and
  • Sharing of firearms import information when restricted and prohibited firearms are imported into Canada by businesses.”

I will update this post with what this actually means when I uncover it.
As I am in the market for a handgun, perhaps my new favourite gun store here in Ontario will fill me in.

Some reference sites:

The RCMP Website

From Parliment

Government Website

CSAAA Canadian Sporting Arms and Ammunition Association

 

 

Do the Liberals and NDP want to Steal our Guns?

I am was actively trying to stay out of the federal election political shit storm.

But then I see the Facebook posts about what Mulcair and Trudeau have to say about firearms.
Some of it is true and some of it is shock-media fear mongering.
There is, however, some definite truth to the hype of them bringing back the gun registry.
Though it may be old, I was forwarded this article in the National Post about Mulcair’s plans: NDP government would create new and improved gun registry

Sure it’s an election cycle and all of these ineffective talking heads have to have talking points and promises to lie about.
But nothing scares me more than allowing any more room for commies, socialists, pinkos, regressive ‘progressives’, antis of any sort, and Turdeau’s Libertarded army.

Below is a great cartoon I found on Right Wing Nation, but I think it originated from the NFA (a cluster fpuck of an organization and has circle jerked itself into ineffectiveness right before one of the most important elections in Canada regarding firearms rights).

Enjoy.  Be on the look out for the Beardo and the Kid.

You could wake up with the NDP and/or Liberals wanting to steal your guns

You could wake up with the NDP and/or Liberals wanting to steal your guns