Category Archives: Financial

Topics involved with financial sovereignty

Investing in South Korea for Canadian investors showing Korea's low forward P/E, Samsung and SK hynix concentration, memory cycle and ETF options

Investing in South Korea: Is the Korea Discount Still Real?

South Korea looks like one of the cheapest major stock markets in the world.

MSCI Korea traded at about 4.95 times forward earnings on September 30, 2026. At the end of August, MSCI Japan was at 16.38 times, MSCI Emerging Markets at 10.07 times, and the broad global MSCI ACWI IMI at 16.76 times. On that number, Korea is priced at roughly half the emerging-market multiple and less than a third of Japan’s.

That looks absurdly cheap.

But the same MSCI data show Korea at 2.29 times book value. Japan was at 2.03 times at the end of August, and emerging markets at 2.40 times. At the end of 2023, according to Robeco’s analysis of Bloomberg data, MSCI Korea traded at about 1.1 times book.

So the Korea discount did not simply vanish, and it did not simply persist. The thing I’m measuring changed.

Continue reading →
Canadian grocery stocks comparing Loblaw, Metro, Empire, North West Company and George Weston, including Northern stores and Weston's Loblaw and Choice Properties holdings

Canadian Grocery Stocks: Can You Hedge Your Grocery Bill by Owning the Grocers?

If my family spends $15,000 a year on groceries and grocery prices rise 3% a year, the bill in twenty years is about $27,000. That is roughly $12,000 a year more than we pay now, and about $115,000 of extra grocery spending along the way.

Canadians have an obvious thing to say about this, and we say it constantly. Grocery prices are too high. The industry is concentrated. Loblaw, Sobeys and Metro make billions of dollars.

So here is a tidy Canadian idea. If Loblaw, Metro and Empire, the parent of Sobeys, really are earning more as grocery prices rise, why not own them? Collect the dividends, let the shares compound, and get a little of the money back from the checkout counter.

I wanted to know whether that actually works.

The answer is yes, but not for the reason I expected.

Continue reading →
Brookfield stocks for Canadian investors comparing BN, BAM, BIP and BEP across asset management, infrastructure and renewable power

Brookfield Stocks for Canadian Investors: BN vs BAM vs BIP vs BEP

A Canadian investor who likes Brookfield can buy Brookfield Corporation, Brookfield Asset Management, Brookfield Infrastructure, Brookfield Renewable or Brookfield Business Corporation. On a brokerage screen that looks like a choice between five companies.

It isn’t.

It’s a choice about where you want to sit inside one capital-allocation system, and who gets paid first.

Here’s the short version. Brookfield Corporation (BN) owns about 74% of Brookfield Asset Management (BAM), the manager. BAM collects fees for running capital, including capital invested through Brookfield’s listed vehicles. Brookfield Infrastructure (BIP), Brookfield Renewable (BEP) and Brookfield Business Corporation (BBUC) own operating assets and carry much more of the financing, construction and operating risk.

Continue reading →
Berkshire Hathaway versus an ETF for Canadian investors comparing cash, insurance float, operating businesses, diversification and market exposure

Berkshire Hathaway for Canadian Investors: Is It Better Than Just Buying an ETF?

Berkshire Hathaway is the largest individual stock in my RRSP.

That makes this an important article to write. It would be easy to explain why Berkshire is a wonderful company, because it is. The harder question is whether I would make the same bet today with fresh money.

If I had the cash sitting in my account right now, would I buy Berkshire, or would I buy an S&P 500 or total-market ETF and be done?

Continue reading →
Investing in Mexico for Canadian investors with factories, logistics, cross-border rail, industrial property and Mexico ETF exposure

Investing in Mexico: Can Canadian Investors Actually Profit From the Nearshoring Boom?

Mexico’s factories are real. I’m not going to argue otherwise. Foreign companies put a record USD 40.9 billion of direct investment into Mexico in 2025, and another USD 35.0 billion in the first half of 2026. Trucks, rail cars and containers cross the border every hour carrying cars, servers and appliances that were assembled in Mexico and sold to Americans.

The question I care about is different. If Mexico wins the nearshoring race, who gets paid, and can a Canadian investor own any of it at a sensible price?

I went looking for the answer the way I did with Vietnam. In that article, an economy growing at roughly 8% a year had delivered about 3% a year to the foreign investor who bought the obvious ETF. Mexico looked like it might be the same story with a different flag.

It isn’t.

It’s closer to the reverse: a slow-growing economy, a stock market that has paid foreign investors respectably, and an investable market that looks surprisingly different from the factories everyone associates with Mexico.

Continue reading →
Bitcoin ETFs in Canada comparing MERs, bid-ask spreads, liquidity, custody, taxable distributions and registered accounts

Bitcoin ETFs in Canada: Which One Should You Actually Buy?

A Canadian can buy a Bitcoin ETF that costs about 0.33% a year, or one that costs more than 1.5%. Either way, the investor ends up with exposure to the same Bitcoin. On CAD 100,000, that is roughly CAD 330 a year versus CAD 1,540 a year, before any compounding.

So what is the more expensive fund doing for the extra money?

The answer is more nuanced than “buy the cheapest one.” The annual fee recurs, but bid-ask spreads are paid when you trade. Custody structures differ. In a taxable account, some of these funds have paid out large capital-gains distributions. And Canadians are not limited to Canadian-listed funds, even inside an RRSP or TFSA.

This article assumes you have already decided you want Bitcoin through an ETF. It does not argue for or against owning Bitcoin. Figures are dated throughout because they come from different measurement periods and are not simultaneous quotes.

Continue reading →
Snowbird versus full relocation for Canadian retirees comparing tax residence, RRSP and RRIF treatment, pension splitting, OAS, healthcare and foreign taxes

Snowbird vs Full Relocation: Should Canadian Retirees Actually Leave Canada?

A CAD 400,000 gap in how Canada taxes a RRIF at death looks like the whole answer, until you ask how much of that RRIF you will actually have left, and where you will genuinely be living when it matters.

Picture two Ontario retirees who started in nearly identical positions. Both retired at 55 with a RRSP worth about CAD 1.5 million. Both are now in their late eighties, widowed, with no spouse left to roll a RRIF over to. One still lives in Ontario. The other genuinely moved away years ago and has been a non-resident of Canada ever since.

If each of them dies this year with a CAD 1.5 million RRIF still sitting there, the Canadian tax difference between them can be roughly CAD 400,000. The resident’s RRIF is generally included in income on the final return, pushing much of a large balance into Canada’s highest marginal tax brackets. For a genuinely non-resident annuitant, the best-supported Canadian treatment is instead a deemed RRIF payment subject to Part XIII withholding, normally at 25 percent.

Continue reading →
Investing in Vietnam for Canadian investors showing economic growth, foreign ownership limits, ETF structure and investor returns

Investing in Vietnam: Can Canadian Investors Actually Capture Vietnam’s Growth?

Vietnam is the country that gets waved around at every “de-risk from China” panel discussion. Samsung builds phones there. Apple’s suppliers have been moving assembly lines there for years. The population is young. The middle class is expanding. GDP has been growing at rates that would make most finance ministers weep with envy. And in September 2026, FTSE Russell finally did what index watchers had been expecting for years: it moved Vietnam out of frontier-market status and into Secondary Emerging Market status, alongside China, India, Indonesia and the Philippines. FTSE Russell’s Vietnam reclassification

On paper, this is exactly the kind of story that should have made patient foreign investors rich.

Continue reading →
Private REITs and real estate syndicates in Canada comparing illiquid private investments with publicly traded REITs

Private REITs and Real Estate Syndicates in Canada: Are the Higher Yields Worth Giving Up Liquidity?

Say you have $100,000 to invest.

Option one: you buy $100,000 of a Canadian REIT ETF. Tomorrow morning you can check what it is worth. If the bond market has a bad week, you might open your account and see $85,000. You will not like that number, but you will know it, and you can hit sell before lunch if you want to.

Option two: you put the same $100,000 into a private apartment REIT or a five-year real estate syndication. Your statement barely moves. The marketing materials talk about a 7 percent preferred return, a 5 percent cash distribution, institutional-quality buildings and “low historical volatility.” It feels calmer. Nothing is flashing red on a screen.

Continue reading →
Home-buying process in Canada showing deposit, mortgage approval, lawyer trust account, title insurance, closing funds and registration

The Home-Buying Process in Canada: Title Insurance, Legal Steps, CMHC Mortgage Insurance, and What Actually Happens Before You Get the Keys

You have an accepted offer. You already sent a deposit to somebody. Your bank told you the mortgage is approved. Then your lawyer calls and asks you to send tens of thousands of dollars into something called a trust account, a few days before closing, for reasons nobody explained clearly. Somewhere in the background, your bank is preparing to send hundreds of thousands of dollars to a place you will never see. The seller still has their own mortgage registered against the house. And then, on closing day, the lawyer calls again and says the house has closed, and you can pick up the keys.

What actually happened in between?

Where did the deposit go. Why was pre-approval not the same thing as approval. Who paid off the seller’s bank, and how did your lawyer know that would actually happen. When did the house legally become yours. Why did you pay for title insurance on top of a lawyer who already searched the title. And if you put down less than 20 percent, why did you pay thousands of dollars for an insurance policy that mostly protects your bank and not you.

Continue reading →