The Electrification Investment Paradox
GE Vernova builds some of the most important machines in the electricity system. At the end of June 2026 its remaining performance obligations, the contracted work it has yet to deliver, stood at USD 176 billion, and second-quarter orders rose 88% on an organic basis, according to its second-quarter results filing. At its 15 October 2026 close of USD 926.44, it also trades at roughly 78 times my estimate of its normalized earnings, or roughly 61 times the consensus estimate I could retrieve.
I do not read that as a prediction that GE Vernova will stumble. It is arithmetic. To earn an 8% annualized return over ten years from that price, my model says GE Vernova’s earnings per share would have to grow about 21% a year, every year, for a decade. My own base case is already generous, with earnings per share growing 16.6% a year, and it still produces a return of only 4.0% a year, because the multiple I assume compresses from 78 times earnings to 24 times by 2036.
That gap between a superb operating business and a mediocre investment is the subject of this article. Electricity demand is growing, grids are being rebuilt and the equipment is being ordered. What is not obvious is how much of that is already in the price.
Continue reading